Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non Vascular Interventions
Case Report, Interventional Oncology
Case Report, Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Pediatric Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Vascular Interventions
Case Series
Case Series, Interventional Oncology
Case Series, Vascular Interventions
Editorial
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Case Report
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions, Original Article
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Original Research
GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Original Research
Interventional Oncology, Patient Care, Practice Management and Education
Interventional Oncology, Technical Innovation
Interventions Oncology, Case Report
Interventions Oncology, Original Research
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Musculoskeletal Interventions, Case Report
Original Research
Original Research, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions
Original Research, Interventional Oncology
Original Research, Vascular Interventions
PATIENT CARE, PRACTICE MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION
Patient Care, Practice Management and Education, Original Research
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Case Report
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Article
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Research
Research Article
Review Article
Review Article, Vascular Interventions
TECHNICAL INNOVATION
Technical Innovation, Interventional Oncology
Vascular Interventions, Case Report
Vascular Interventions, Original Research
Vascular Interventions, Technical Innovation
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non Vascular Interventions
Case Report, Interventional Oncology
Case Report, Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Pediatric Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Vascular Interventions
Case Series
Case Series, Interventional Oncology
Case Series, Vascular Interventions
Editorial
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Case Report
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions, Original Article
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Original Research
GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Original Research
Interventional Oncology, Patient Care, Practice Management and Education
Interventional Oncology, Technical Innovation
Interventions Oncology, Case Report
Interventions Oncology, Original Research
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Musculoskeletal Interventions, Case Report
Original Research
Original Research, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions
Original Research, Interventional Oncology
Original Research, Vascular Interventions
PATIENT CARE, PRACTICE MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION
Patient Care, Practice Management and Education, Original Research
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Case Report
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Article
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Research
Research Article
Review Article
Review Article, Vascular Interventions
TECHNICAL INNOVATION
Technical Innovation, Interventional Oncology
Vascular Interventions, Case Report
Vascular Interventions, Original Research
Vascular Interventions, Technical Innovation
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non Vascular Interventions
Case Report, Interventional Oncology
Case Report, Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Pediatric Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Vascular Interventions
Case Series
Case Series, Interventional Oncology
Case Series, Vascular Interventions
Editorial
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Case Report
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions, Original Article
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Original Research
GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Original Research
Interventional Oncology, Patient Care, Practice Management and Education
Interventional Oncology, Technical Innovation
Interventions Oncology, Case Report
Interventions Oncology, Original Research
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Musculoskeletal Interventions, Case Report
Original Research
Original Research, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions
Original Research, Interventional Oncology
Original Research, Vascular Interventions
PATIENT CARE, PRACTICE MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION
Patient Care, Practice Management and Education, Original Research
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Case Report
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Article
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Research
Research Article
Review Article
Review Article, Vascular Interventions
TECHNICAL INNOVATION
Technical Innovation, Interventional Oncology
Vascular Interventions, Case Report
Vascular Interventions, Original Research
Vascular Interventions, Technical Innovation
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non Vascular Interventions
2024
:8;
11
doi:
10.25259/AJIR_13_2024

Recurrent symptomatic abdominopelvic cystic lesions of unknown etiology treated with image-guided sclerotherapy: A case report

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia, United States.
Department of Interventional Radiology, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia, United States.

*Corresponding author: Landon Foulger, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia, United States. landon.foulger@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Foulger L, Simmons K, Bush S, Deipolyi A. Recurrent symptomatic abdominopelvic cystic lesions of unknown etiology treated with image-guided sclerotherapy: A case report. Am J Interv Radiol. 2024;8:11. doi: 10.25259/AJIR_13_2024

Abstract

This case report highlights the diagnostic approach and treatment for 30 cm bilateral multiloculated pelvic peritoneal cystic masses. The patient had a history of spina bifida with ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement and neurogenic bladder with partial cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion. The cysts were suspected to be peritoneal inclusion cysts. Due to prior failed surgical intervention, the patient was treated with image-guided sclerotherapy.

Keywords

Adnexal mass
Image-guided
Peritoneal inclusion cyst
Sclerotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Enlarging multiloculated pelvic cysts are often misdiagnosed as ovarian malignancies. The differential for pelvic cysts can include ovarian tumor, paratubal cyst, lymphocele, hematoma, urinoma, cerebrospinal fluid pseudocyst (CSFoma), and peritoneal inclusion cyst. Ultrasound with color Doppler along with cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) levels and the use of a risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm can aid in assessing malignancy risk.[1] Once malignancy risk has been assessed and risk is low, treatment options include observation, percutaneous drainage, image-guided sclerotherapy, and surgical intervention through laparoscopic or laparotomy approaches. Symptomatic cysts require intervention whereas asymptomatic cysts can be treated with expectant observational management. Symptomatic cysts can cause pelvic pain, pelvic fullness, or compressive mass effects including pain radiating to the back, dyspareunia, early satiety, changes in stool habits, or increased urinary frequency/pressure.[2] Infertility has also been reported.[1] Pain may be exacerbated if the cyst ruptures and irritates the peritoneum or if it becomes infected.

Ovarian cysts have been treated conservatively with hormonal therapy using combined contraceptive pills and/or drainage. Drainage often requires sonographic guidance or computed tomographic guidance if the cyst is deep within the pelvis. Other surgical treatment options include minimally invasive surgery or laparotomy for cyst excision; however, this is not appropriate for all patients such as those with extensive pelvic surgery history or high risk for anesthesia.[3]

We present a case of chronic, large, and recurrent abdominopelvic cystic lesions in a medically complex patient with extensive prior surgical history, along with the diagnostic approach, treatment, and patient outcomes using a multidisciplinary team.

CASE REPORT

A 28-year-old woman presented with abdominal pain and had a complex medical history including spina bifida with prior ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement, neurogenic bladder with prior partial cystectomy, Mitrofanoff and ileal conduit diversion, as well prior Malone antegrade colonic enema procedure. Computed tomography (CT) imaging revealed 30 × 25 × 20-cm multiloculated cystic masses likely originating from ovaries/adnexa, extending from the level of the kidneys to the pelvic floor [Figure 1]. Tubing from the VP shunt was present in the peritoneal cavity.

A 29-year-old female who presented with pelvic pain. Computed tomography without contrast showing large pelvic fluid collections.
Figure 1:
A 29-year-old female who presented with pelvic pain. Computed tomography without contrast showing large pelvic fluid collections.

Prior imaging revealed chronic fluid collections in the abdomen present for at least 10 years, with a significant increase in size in the past 5 years. Differential diagnosis included ovarian neoplasm, CSFoma, urinoma, and peritoneal inclusion cyst. The patient had previously had an exploratory laparotomy surgery for these cystic lesions revealing benign cyst wall; however, due to extensive pelvic adhesions, cyst walls were not completely resected.

On admission, the patient presented with abdominal pain that had been worsening for the previous 2 weeks. She characterized the pain as fullness, with severe sharp pain, causing her to be unable to stand upright or lay down comfortably. The pain had been present for months but was now worse with movement and causing significant interference with her daily function. She noted increasingly more abdominal distention with associated nausea and occasional vomiting. In addition, she was concerned that she was obtaining less volume of urine during her intermittent self-catheterizations.

Workup was initiated with aspiration of 3.5L of tea-colored fluid. Beta-2 transferrin level was obtained to rule out cerebrospinal fluid collection which returned negative. There were no malignant cells on cytology, and CA-125 was normal, making cancer of ovarian origin unlikely. Microbial cultures were also negative.

After the initial aspiration, symptoms improved but worsened several days later. She was having similar symptoms to her initial presentation and was having complaints of feeling bloated, having difficulty sleeping and walking due to the pain. Repeat imaging revealed recurrent large, loculated fluid collections in the lower abdomen and pelvis with new obstruction of the left ureter. Urology was consulted and recommended ureteral stent placement if clinical status and renal function worsened.

Repeat aspiration was performed 4 days later, removing 2 L of clear, slightly tea-colored fluid. However, her symptoms and the cystic lesions recurred. There was a high suspicion for bilateral peritoneal inclusion cysts as a diagnosis of exclusion. Gynecologic oncology and general surgery services reviewed prior records and imaging and decided operative intervention to be delayed given extensive surgical history and failed prior attempt at resection. Interventional radiology was consulted for drain placement and evaluation for possible sclerotherapy.

Interventional radiology performed sclerotherapy on 11/16/23 [Figure 2]. Two 10-French pigtail catheters were placed under CT guidance, with 50 cc of serous fluid removed from each side. Absolute ethanol was injected into each abdominopelvic cyst (7 cc on the right and 5 cc on the left). The patient had resolution of her pain and discomfort after the sclerotherapy procedure on post-operative day 1. There was continued output from the drains, so the patient was discharged with the drains in place. Repeat CT imaging showed significant improvement in pelvic cysts size. The drains were removed once the output from the drains had decreased to <10 cc/day.

A 29-year-old female with suspected peritoneal inclusion cysts undergoing computed tomography (CT)-guided drainage by interventional radiology. CT during interventional radiologic sclerotherapy showing penetration of inclusion cyst.
Figure 2:
A 29-year-old female with suspected peritoneal inclusion cysts undergoing computed tomography (CT)-guided drainage by interventional radiology. CT during interventional radiologic sclerotherapy showing penetration of inclusion cyst.

Repeat CT imaging performed 3 weeks later showed the absence of previous fluid collections and a simple-appearing 4-cm right adnexal cyst [Figure 3]. She has followed up with gynecologic oncology and has had intermittent pelvic pain complaints. Her continued complaints of pelvic pain are suspected to be multifactorial in nature given her complex history. Since her sclerotherapy, she has been treated for urinary tract infections and treated with pelvic floor physical therapy. Close surveillance with serial pelvic imaging has confirmed near complete resolution of abdominopelvic masses with the overall improvement of initial pain symptoms. This case describes a unique presentation of chronic pelvic pain and recurrent symptomatic abdominopelvic cystic lesions suspected to be bilateral peritoneal inclusion cysts which were successfully treated with image-guided sclerotherapy in the setting of a complex medical history.

A 29-year-old female status post-interventional radiologic (IR) drainage of peritoneal inclusion cysts. Computed tomography post-sclerotherapy showing reduction in cysts size.
Figure 3:
A 29-year-old female status post-interventional radiologic (IR) drainage of peritoneal inclusion cysts. Computed tomography post-sclerotherapy showing reduction in cysts size.

DISCUSSION

This case report described the successful treatment of complex abdominal pelvic lesions suspected to be peritoneal inclusion cysts with image-guided drainage and ethanol sclerotherapy. Peritoneal inclusion cysts are benign, multiloculated cysts, containing fluid trapped between intraperitoneal adhesions. Pathologically, these are pseudocysts lined with hyperplastic, proliferating mesothelial cells within granulation tissue walls.[4] Risk factors for peritoneal inclusion cysts include inflammation, endometriosis, prior abdominal surgery, trauma of the abdomen, radiation history, or inflammatory bowel disease.[2,5] Due to trauma, inflammation, or surgical history, the peritoneum may have a decreased ability to resorb fluid. Fluids can then become trapped and produce a complex cystic mass. On imaging, these cysts can be mistaken for ovarian neoplasms which are why a malignancy risk assessment is recommended. Peritoneal inclusion cysts are classically described with a “spider in the web” pattern. These cysts are multiseptated, fluid-containing, are often adjacent to pelvic structures, and/or adherent to the ovary but do not involve the ovarian parenchyma. On CT, these cystic masses may have regular or irregular borders, which contain fluid or material. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) typically reveals low T1 signals and high T2 signals consistent with serous fluid.[5] Fluid cytology is typically non-specific which aids to misdiagnosis as well.[1]

Peritoneal inclusion cysts can be treated with expectant management, hormonal therapy, or image-guided aspiration. However, there is a high recurrence rate, up to 50%, for peritoneal inclusion cysts and often surgical excision is required.[2] At present, medical and surgical options for treatment are utilized based on patient presentation, symptoms, and goals of care. For the patient mentioned in this case, the surgical excision attempt had been aborted due to inability for complete resection due to adhesions. With rapidly enlarging and recurrent bilateral pelvic cysts, a multidisciplinary team approach was utilized, and the patient underwent image-guided sclerotherapy.

Image-guided sclerotherapy has been used to treat ovarian endometriomas, reduce recurrence, and maintain fertility as compared to laparoscopy or laparotomy interventions.[6,7] Sclerotherapy has also been used by interventional radiologists for other intra-abdominal and pelvic cystic lesions. A study of 29 patient’s evaluated long-term outcomes for peritoneal inclusion cysts treated by sclerotherapy with only three recurrences noted, suggesting this to be a safe and effective treatment option. Image-guided sclerotherapy is performed after image-guided drainage. Most often, the drainage catheter is left in place for repeated sclerotherapy sessions, and to assess reduction in daily output from the cyst.[8] Many sclerosing agents have been used, including doxycycline, betadine, and absolute ethanol. During a sclerotherapy session, contrast is injected into the cyst under fluoroscopy to exclude spillage and estimate the cyst volume.[3,6,8] Roughly half the residual volume of the cyst is used as the volume of sclerosant. Sclerosant is left in situ with the drainage catheter capped for at least 1 h before uncapping the drain and aspirating the contents. Alcohol sclerotherapy works by causing protein denaturation, cytotoxic damage, and fibrosis. The goal of the procedure is to allow alcohol to contact the entire cyst wall without extravasation. The alcohol is aspirated to reduce pain and complications and the catheter is removed. Sclerotherapy is typically performed as an outpatient procedure and may involve conscious sedation.

CONCLUSION

Peritoneal inclusion cysts should be considered in the differential diagnosis for pelvic pain and large multicystic pelvic masses. Physicians should be familiar with characteristic imaging findings and risk factors for these benign cysts. Care is tailored to patient symptoms, goals, and appropriateness for surgery. For poor surgical candidates and those with recurrent cysts, such as the patient described in this case, sclerotherapy is an innovative, reasonable, and effective option. This case demonstrates a successful treatment of symptomatic peritoneal inclusion cysts by image-guided percutaneous drainage and sclerotherapy. After excluding other differential diagnoses and assessing malignancy risk to be low, physicians should be aware that for poor surgical candidates, sclerotherapy is an option for peritoneal inclusion cyst treatment.

Ethical approval

The Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. , , , . Peritoneal inclusion cysts as a diagnostic and treatment challenge. Ginekol Pol. 2021;92:583-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Peritoneal inclusion cyst in a young patient with a long history of abdominal surgeries: A case report. Cureus. 2023;15:e35230.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Percutaneous drainage without sclerotherapy for benign ovarian cysts. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:921-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , . Subserosal adenomyotic cysts and peritoneal inclusion cysts-Unusual differential diagnoses of multicystic pelvic masses: A review of two cases. Case Rep Womens Health. 2020;27:e00193.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Peritoneal inclusion cysts in female children: Pathogenesis, treatment, and multimodality imaging review. Case Rep Radiol. 2014;2014:427427.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Catheter-directed sclerotherapy for ovarian endometrioma: Short-term outcomes. Radiology. 2018;289:854-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy for the treatment of ovarian endometrioma: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2022;32:1726-37.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Radiologic management of cysts in the abdomen and pelvis. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:562-73.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections