Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non Vascular Interventions
Case Report, Interventional Oncology
Case Report, Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Pediatric Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Vascular Interventions
Case Series
Case Series, Interventional Oncology
Case Series, Vascular Interventions
Editorial
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Case Report
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions, Original Article
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Original Research
GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Original Research
Interventional Oncology, Patient Care, Practice Management and Education
Interventional Oncology, Technical Innovation
Interventions Oncology, Case Report
Interventions Oncology, Original Research
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Musculoskeletal Interventions, Case Report
Original Research
Original Research, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions
Original Research, GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions
Original Research, Interventional Oncology
Original Research, Neurologic Interventions
Original Research, Vascular Interventions
PATIENT CARE, PRACTICE MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION
Patient Care, Practice Management and Education, Original Research
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Case Report
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Article
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Research
Research Article
Review Article
Review Article, Vascular Interventions
TECHNICAL INNOVATION
Technical Innovation, GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvasculat Interventions
Technical Innovation, Interventional Oncology
Vascular Interventions, Case Report
Vascular Interventions, Original Research
Vascular Interventions, Technical Innovation
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non Vascular Interventions
Case Report, Interventional Oncology
Case Report, Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Pediatric Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Vascular Interventions
Case Series
Case Series, Interventional Oncology
Case Series, Vascular Interventions
Editorial
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Case Report
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions, Original Article
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Original Research
GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Original Research
Interventional Oncology, Patient Care, Practice Management and Education
Interventional Oncology, Technical Innovation
Interventions Oncology, Case Report
Interventions Oncology, Original Research
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Musculoskeletal Interventions, Case Report
Original Research
Original Research, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions
Original Research, GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions
Original Research, Interventional Oncology
Original Research, Neurologic Interventions
Original Research, Vascular Interventions
PATIENT CARE, PRACTICE MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION
Patient Care, Practice Management and Education, Original Research
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Case Report
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Article
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Research
Research Article
Review Article
Review Article, Vascular Interventions
TECHNICAL INNOVATION
Technical Innovation, GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvasculat Interventions
Technical Innovation, Interventional Oncology
Vascular Interventions, Case Report
Vascular Interventions, Original Research
Vascular Interventions, Technical Innovation
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non Vascular Interventions
Case Report, Interventional Oncology
Case Report, Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Pediatric Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Vascular Interventions
Case Series
Case Series, Interventional Oncology
Case Series, Vascular Interventions
Editorial
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Case Report
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions, Original Article
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Original Research
GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Original Research
Interventional Oncology, Patient Care, Practice Management and Education
Interventional Oncology, Technical Innovation
Interventions Oncology, Case Report
Interventions Oncology, Original Research
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Musculoskeletal Interventions, Case Report
Original Research
Original Research, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions
Original Research, GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions
Original Research, Interventional Oncology
Original Research, Neurologic Interventions
Original Research, Vascular Interventions
PATIENT CARE, PRACTICE MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION
Patient Care, Practice Management and Education, Original Research
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Case Report
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Article
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Research
Research Article
Review Article
Review Article, Vascular Interventions
TECHNICAL INNOVATION
Technical Innovation, GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvasculat Interventions
Technical Innovation, Interventional Oncology
Vascular Interventions, Case Report
Vascular Interventions, Original Research
Vascular Interventions, Technical Innovation
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
Vascular Interventions
2025
:9;
1
doi:
10.25259/AJIR_38_2024

Inferior epigastric origin of the uterine artery during uterine artery embolization

Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States.
Author image

*Corresponding author: Irfan Masood, Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States. irmasood@utmb.edu

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Gunn JH, Patel SG, Mohammadinejad P, Masood I. Inferior epigastric origin of the uterine artery during uterine artery embolization. Am J Interv Radiol. 2025;9:1. doi: 10.25259/AJIR_38_2024

Abstract

The uterine artery (UA) originates from the anterior branch of the internal iliac artery (IIA). Several variants within the IIA territory have been described. More distant sites of origin include the superior mesenteric, inferior mesenteric, and external iliac arteries. Specifically, origin from the external iliac artery is extremely rare and we are only aware of one reported case in the literature. Herein, we report a case of a 43-year-old woman who required UA embolization to control abnormal uterine bleeding secondary to cervical cancer that was refractory to medical management and palliative radiation. During the procedure, it was discovered that the left UA shared a common trunk with the left inferior epigastric artery and arose from the external iliac artery.

Keywords

angiography
embolization
iliac artery
Menorrhagia
uterine artery

INTRODUCTION

Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is regularly performed for various causes of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). Common causes include leiomyoma and adenomyosis while less commonly employed for endometrial disorders, coagulopathy, ovulatory dysfunction, and malignancy.[1,2] The procedure involves selective catheterization of the bilateral uterine arteries (UAs) which originates from the internal iliac artery (IIA) in the majority of cases. This is done through common femoral or radial artery access approach. Knowledge of variant anatomy is essential for the technical and clinical success of the procedure.

Here, we describe a case of left UA origin variant anatomy that was encountered during an UAE procedure for the management of AUB secondary to Stage III C1, grade I cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

CASE REPORT

The patient is a 43-year-old female with a medical history of Stage III C1, grade I cervical SCC who has undergone six cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin. Pre-procedurally, the patient had undergone magnetic resonance imaging cross-sectional imaging demonstrating the cervical malignancy [Figure 1]. She presents with recurrent AUB and anemia which was refractory to medical management and palliative radiotherapy. The patient was informed of the risks and benefits of the procedure and elected to undergo UAE.

A 43-year-old female with Stage III C1 cervical cancer who presented with abnormal uterine bleeding. Coronal T2-weighted magnetic resonance image demonstrating the cervical malignancy (white arrow).
Figure 1:
A 43-year-old female with Stage III C1 cervical cancer who presented with abnormal uterine bleeding. Coronal T2-weighted magnetic resonance image demonstrating the cervical malignancy (white arrow).

Right common femoral artery access was obtained through micro-puncture technique with placement of a 5 French vascular sheath. A 5 French Omni Flush catheter (Accu-Vu Omni™, Angiodynamics, Latham, NY, USA) was advanced to select the left IIA. The right IIA was selected using a 5 French Bernstein catheter. All other selections were performed with 2.5 French Progreat catheter (PROGREAT®, Terumo Interventional Systems, Somerset, NJ, USA) and 0.014 Fathom microwire (Fathom™, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA).

The initial left internal iliac angiogram displayed no classic UA. Additional catheter selections of the anterior division were performed to confirm the absence of the left UA from the IIA. The left external iliac artery was then interrogated in which medially coursing arteries that supplied the uterus were noted arising from the left inferior epigastric artery [Figure 2a and b]. Angiography was performed to confirm the origin of the left UA at the left inferior epigastric artery. To prevent non-target particle embolization of the rectus muscles, protective coil embolization of distal inferior epigastric artery was performed [Figure 3]. The aberrant left UA was then embolized with 250 micron microsphere through selective catheterization. Post embolization angiogram revealed adequate hemostasis to the UA.

(a and b) A 43-year-old female with Stage III C1 cervical cancer who presented with abnormal uterine bleeding. Digital subtraction angiograms, (a) early arterial phase of the left proximal inferior epigastric artery demonstrating the tortuous, medially coursing, and uterine artery (solid black arrow) originating from the left inferior epigastric artery (dashed black arrow). (b) Delayed arterial phase, image 2b, was obtained immediately following image 2a and shows continued course of the uterine artery (solid black arrow).
Figure 2:
(a and b) A 43-year-old female with Stage III C1 cervical cancer who presented with abnormal uterine bleeding. Digital subtraction angiograms, (a) early arterial phase of the left proximal inferior epigastric artery demonstrating the tortuous, medially coursing, and uterine artery (solid black arrow) originating from the left inferior epigastric artery (dashed black arrow). (b) Delayed arterial phase, image 2b, was obtained immediately following image 2a and shows continued course of the uterine artery (solid black arrow).
A 43-year-old female with Stage III C1 cervical cancer who presented with abnormal uterine bleeding. Fluoroscopic angiogram of the left inferior epigastric artery showing successful coil embolization (solid black arrow) of the left inferior epigastric artery with a microcatheter in the origin of the left uterine artery (dashed black arrow).
Figure 3:
A 43-year-old female with Stage III C1 cervical cancer who presented with abnormal uterine bleeding. Fluoroscopic angiogram of the left inferior epigastric artery showing successful coil embolization (solid black arrow) of the left inferior epigastric artery with a microcatheter in the origin of the left uterine artery (dashed black arrow).

After the successful embolization of the left sided UA, the right internal iliac was accessed. Diagnostic arteriogram showed normal UA anatomy and two cervico-vaginal branches supplying the cervix in the known mass area. Successful embolization of the two right cervico-vaginal branches was achieved through metallic coils [Figure 4]. Embolization of the right UA was achieved with 500–700 micron microspheres. An aortogram was performed directly after bilateral embolization that demonstrated no variants or parasitized vessels that could potentially supply the cervical mass [Figure 5]. Following embolization, a hypogastric nerve block was performed at the lower border of the L4 vertebra injecting 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under fluoroscopic guidance.

A 43-year-old female with Stage III C1 cervical cancer who presented with abnormal uterine bleeding. Digital subtraction angiogram demonstrating normal right sided uterine artery (solid black arrow) originating from the internal iliac artery. In addition, coil embolization (dashed black arrow) of the two right cervico-vaginal branches can be appreciated.
Figure 4:
A 43-year-old female with Stage III C1 cervical cancer who presented with abnormal uterine bleeding. Digital subtraction angiogram demonstrating normal right sided uterine artery (solid black arrow) originating from the internal iliac artery. In addition, coil embolization (dashed black arrow) of the two right cervico-vaginal branches can be appreciated.
A 43-year-old female with Stage III C1 cervical cancer who presented with abnormal uterine bleeding. Digital subtraction angiogram of the abdominal aorta demonstrating bilateral coil embolization and no further arterial supply to the cervical malignancy.
Figure 5:
A 43-year-old female with Stage III C1 cervical cancer who presented with abnormal uterine bleeding. Digital subtraction angiogram of the abdominal aorta demonstrating bilateral coil embolization and no further arterial supply to the cervical malignancy.

DISCUSSION

UAE is a minimally invasive alternative to hysterectomy in the management of AUB not responding to the medical management as well as symptomatic relief of uterine fibroids. While UAE can obviate the need for hysterectomy, its success is dependent on an accurate understanding of the UA anatomy in each individual.[3] The UA most commonly originates from anterior division of the IIA in the majority of the cases.[4] However, anatomical variations in the origin of the UA are frequently encountered, such as originating from the inferior gluteal artery being one of its common variant origins. A comparison between the findings of several studies also suggests that there could also be different anatomical variants of the UA origin between different populations.[5] The variant observed in this case involved the UA arising from the inferior epigastric artery. This is a rare variant which to the best of our knowledge has been reported only once in the literature.[6]

The inferior epigastric artery supplies the lower abdominal wall and involves anastomoses with the superior epigastric artery. Typically, the UA is appreciated interrogating divisions of the internal iliac. In this case, the external iliac artery was interrogated, which is not routinely performed in a UAE procedure, and revealed the aberrant vessel. Failure to properly recognize this anatomical variant could result in ineffective treatment of target regions with continued breakthrough bleeding. Given the anatomic location and short origin of the left UA, ischemic necrosis of the lower abdominal wall is a potential complication of treatment.[7] Careful consideration was taken in the embolization of this case to avoid lower abdominal wall infarct. In our experience, to prevent non-target embolization, a metallic coil was placed in the left inferior epigastric artery distal to the UA origin. After coil placement, 250 µm microspheres were first used to embolize the catheter selected aberrant left UA. In this case, the left UA was much smaller in caliber with sluggish flow and preferential flow of blood into the more dominant parent inferior epigastric artery. Therefore, the inferior epigastric artery was embolized with coils and smaller particle size was used to achieve deeper penetration of embolic agent. The right uterine was larger in caliber with typical origin off the anterior division of the right IIA. Therefore, 500–700 µm particles were used which is typical for a UAE.

CONCLUSION

Variant anatomy of the origin of the UA can present challenges during the procedure and effective achievement of embolization. Pre-procedural imaging, such as CT aortogram, can be used to identify variant anatomy before a UAE procedure. Clinicians must be aware of potential variations, such as the example discussed in this case. In cases where variant anatomy is encountered, careful catheterization should be used to access aberrant vessels to avoid procedural complications.

Ethical approval

The Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Uterine artery embolization: Interventional radiologist's perspective in management of uncontrolled obstetric hemorrhage. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2022;72(Suppl 1):126-33.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Uterine artery embolization for heavy menstrual bleeding. Womens Health (Lond). 2016;12:71-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Effectiveness of elective unilateral uterine artery embolization: A case-control study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:716-22.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Anatomic variations of the uterine artery. Review of the literature and their clinical significance. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;17:58-62.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Radiological anatomical study of the origin of the uterine artery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014;36:1093-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Inferior epigastric uterine artery. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28:23.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Abdominal wall necrosis after harvest of both internal thoracic and inferior epigastric arteries. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:38-41.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections