Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report, CGI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions
Case Report, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non Vascular Interventions
Case Report, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Intervention
Case Report, GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions
Case Report, Interventional Oncology
Case Report, Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Pediatric Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Vascular Interventional
Case Report, Vascular Interventions
Case Series
Case Series, Interventional Oncology
Case Series, Vascular Interventions
Editorial
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Case Report
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions, Original Article
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Original Research
GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Original Research
Interventional Oncology, Patient Care, Practice Management and Education
Interventional Oncology, Technical Innovation
Interventions Oncology, Case Report
Interventions Oncology, Original Research
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor, Vascular Interventions
Musculoskeletal Interventions, Case Report
Original Research
Original Research, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions
Original Research, GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions
Original Research, Interventional Oncology
Original Research, Neurologic Interventions
Original Research, Patient Care, Practice Management and Education
Original Research, Vascular Interventions
PATIENT CARE, PRACTICE MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION
Patient Care, Practice Management and Education, Original Research
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Case Report
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Article
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Research
Research Article
Review Article
Review Article, Vascular Interventions
TECHNICAL INNOVATION
Technical Innovation, GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvasculat Interventions
Technical Innovation, Interventional Oncology
Vascular Interventions, Case Report
Vascular Interventions, Original Research
Vascular Interventions, Technical Innovation

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report, CGI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions
Case Report, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non Vascular Interventions
Case Report, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Intervention
Case Report, GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions
Case Report, Interventional Oncology
Case Report, Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Pediatric Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Vascular Interventional
Case Report, Vascular Interventions
Case Series
Case Series, Interventional Oncology
Case Series, Vascular Interventions
Editorial
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Case Report
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions, Original Article
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Original Research
GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Original Research
Interventional Oncology, Patient Care, Practice Management and Education
Interventional Oncology, Technical Innovation
Interventions Oncology, Case Report
Interventions Oncology, Original Research
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor, Vascular Interventions
Musculoskeletal Interventions, Case Report
Original Research
Original Research, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions
Original Research, GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions
Original Research, Interventional Oncology
Original Research, Neurologic Interventions
Original Research, Patient Care, Practice Management and Education
Original Research, Vascular Interventions
PATIENT CARE, PRACTICE MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION
Patient Care, Practice Management and Education, Original Research
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Case Report
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Article
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Research
Research Article
Review Article
Review Article, Vascular Interventions
TECHNICAL INNOVATION
Technical Innovation, GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvasculat Interventions
Technical Innovation, Interventional Oncology
Vascular Interventions, Case Report
Vascular Interventions, Original Research
Vascular Interventions, Technical Innovation

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Case Report
Case Report, CGI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions
Case Report, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non Vascular Interventions
Case Report, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Intervention
Case Report, GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions
Case Report, Interventional Oncology
Case Report, Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Pediatric Interventional Radiology
Case Report, Vascular Interventional
Case Report, Vascular Interventions
Case Series
Case Series, Interventional Oncology
Case Series, Vascular Interventions
Editorial
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Case Report
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions, Original Article
GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-Vascular Interventions, Original Research
GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Case Report
Interventional Oncology, Original Research
Interventional Oncology, Patient Care, Practice Management and Education
Interventional Oncology, Technical Innovation
Interventions Oncology, Case Report
Interventions Oncology, Original Research
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor, Vascular Interventions
Musculoskeletal Interventions, Case Report
Original Research
Original Research, GI/GU/Thoracic/Non-vascular Interventions
Original Research, GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvascular Interventions
Original Research, Interventional Oncology
Original Research, Neurologic Interventions
Original Research, Patient Care, Practice Management and Education
Original Research, Vascular Interventions
PATIENT CARE, PRACTICE MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION
Patient Care, Practice Management and Education, Original Research
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Case Report
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Article
Pediatric Interventional Radiology, Original Research
Research Article
Review Article
Review Article, Vascular Interventions
TECHNICAL INNOVATION
Technical Innovation, GI/GU/Thoracic/Nonvasculat Interventions
Technical Innovation, Interventional Oncology
Vascular Interventions, Case Report
Vascular Interventions, Original Research
Vascular Interventions, Technical Innovation
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Technical Innovation
Interventional Oncology
2026
:10;
7
doi:
10.25259/AJIR_3_2026

Thermal-assisted visceral pleural dissection to overcome pleural tenting during lung ablation: A technical innovation

Department of Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States.
Author image
Corresponding author: Erez Klein, Department of Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United States. erez.klein@moffitt.org
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Klein E, McCarthy J, Kis B. Thermal-assisted visceral pleural dissection to overcome pleural tenting during lung ablation: A technical innovation. Am J Interv Radiol. 2026;10:7. doi: 10.25259/AJIR_3_2026

Abstract

Percutaneous thermal ablation of subpleural and fissural lung lesions can be technically challenging because the visceral pleura may tent rather than allow smooth probe penetration. This can limit accurate probe positioning and delay or complicate lesion access. We describe a simple operator-initiated technique that uses brief, controlled thermal activation of the ablation probe to facilitate traversal of the visceral pleural interface during lung ablation procedures. Four patients with metastatic lung lesions undergoing CT-guided percutaneous thermal ablation demonstrated significant pleural tenting during probe advancement. Procedures were performed under general anesthesia with controlled breath-hold technique. In one case, microwave energy was applied for a short interval through the ablation probe to assist pleural penetration, while in three cases cryoablation probes were briefly activated using the active thaw (“i-Thaw”) function to achieve pleural dissection. In all cases, immediate CT imaging confirmed successful disruption of the tented pleura and allowed advancement of the probe into the target lesion. No pneumothorax, pleural complications, or bronchial fistula were identified on intraprocedural or immediate postprocedural imaging. This preliminary experience suggests that short, controlled thermal activation of ablation probes may provide a practical adjunctive technique for overcoming visceral pleural tenting during lung ablation procedures and improving access to difficult subpleural lesions. Further study is needed to better define procedural safety, reproducibility, and optimal energy settings.

Keywords

Image-guided intervention
Lung ablation
Pleural tenting
Technical innovation
Visceral pleura

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous thermal ablation is an established minimally invasive treatment option for primary and metastatic lung tumors.[1] Accurate probe placement within or immediately adjacent to the target lesion is critical to achieving effective ablation margins while minimizing complications. Subpleural and fissural lung lesions, however, present a distinct technical challenge due to the mechanical properties of the visceral pleura.[2,3]

Visceral pleural tenting occurs when advancement of an ablation probe causes deformation and traction of the pleura without successful penetration, resulting in displacement of the lung parenchyma away from the target lesion. This phenomenon may lead to suboptimal probe positioning, prolonged procedure time, or procedural failure. Commonly employed strategies to mitigate pleural tenting include adjustment of needle trajectory, patient positioning, respiratory control, hydrodissection, and parenchymal buffering. Despite these measures, pleural tenting may persist in select cases.[4-6]

We describe a novel, operator-initiated technical maneuver using brief, controlled thermal activation of the ablation probe to facilitate dissection through the tented visceral pleura, enabling accurate probe advancement toward the target lesion. This report outlines the technique and presents four cases utilizing different thermal ablation platforms.

METHODS

Concept and rationale

The visceral pleura is a thin but mechanically resilient structure.[6] When subjected to forward pressure from a percutaneous probe, it may deform rather than rupture, leading to tenting. Controlled application of thermal energy at the probe tip may transiently weaken or disrupt the pleural interface, allowing controlled traversal while minimizing excessive mechanical force.[7]

The proposed technique involves brief, low-duration thermal activation of the ablation probe at the point of pleural tenting, performed under continuous computed tomography (CT) guidance, with immediate cessation of energy delivery once pleural traversal is achieved.

Procedural setting and technique

All lung thermal ablation procedures were performed in a dedicated interventional CT suite (Siemens Definition Edge©) under general anesthesia. Patients were routinely positioned in a lateral decubitus position contralateral to the target lesion to optimize access and minimize respiratory motion (e.g., left lateral decubitus positioning for right lung lesions). All patients were endotracheally intubated with a double-lumen endotracheal tube, maintained as a fail-safe measure to permit selective lung isolation in the event of significant intraprocedural pulmonary hemorrhage.

Probe advancement was performed exclusively during controlled breath holds at end expiration, a strategy used to reduce diaphragmatic motion and optimize visceral pleural tension to facilitate needle penetration. All intraprocedural CT acquisitions were reconstructed in real time using multiplanar 3D visualization, allowing simultaneous axial, sagittal, and coronal assessment to guide probe trajectory and confirm spatial relationships.

When persistent visceral pleural tenting was encountered during probe advancement [Figure 1], a controlled transient thermal activation technique was employed. Depending on the location of the target lesion, either microwave ablation or cryoablation was used. For microwave ablation, specifically the Varian IntelliBlate© system was utilized, whereas cryoablation was performed using a Boston Scientific IcePearl© cryoablation probe, utilizing the system’s active thaw (“i-thaw”) function. Transient thermal activation was performed during a breath hold (65 Watts for 15 s for the microwave ablation probe and 50°–70° for 15 s for the cryoablation probe, respectively). Successful disruption of the visceral pleura was defined by loss of pleural tenting and forward advancement of the probe tip beyond the pleural interface on immediate post-activation CT imaging, most noticeably appreciated on sagittal reconstructions.

76-year-old female with metastatic leiomyosarcoma to the lung. (A) Sagittal view non-contrast computed tomography image demonstrating tenting and traction of the visceral pleura caused by the microwave ablation probe during positioning (blue arrow). The adjacent target lesion is pulling away from the ablation probe (red star). (B) After 15 s of microwave energy delivery at 65 W, controlled disruption of the tented visceral pleura is observed (red arrow), resulting in release of traction and optimal juxtaposition of the probe to the target lesion. PL: Planned Line. N1: Needle 1. Green, orange and purple cursors indicate digital trajectory alignment markers
Figure 1: 76-year-old female with metastatic leiomyosarcoma to the lung. (A) Sagittal view non-contrast computed tomography image demonstrating tenting and traction of the visceral pleura caused by the microwave ablation probe during positioning (blue arrow). The adjacent target lesion is pulling away from the ablation probe (red star). (B) After 15 s of microwave energy delivery at 65 W, controlled disruption of the tented visceral pleura is observed (red arrow), resulting in release of traction and optimal juxtaposition of the probe to the target lesion. PL: Planned Line. N1: Needle 1. Green, orange and purple cursors indicate digital trajectory alignment markers

Once the ablation probe was positioned in an optimal juxtalesional location [Figure 2], definitive ablation was performed according to standard manufacturer-recommended protocols. The brief transient thermal activation used to facilitate pleural traversal did not alter or subtract from the prescribed ablation time for lesion treatment.

72-year-old female with metastatic pancreatic cancer presenting with a solitary lung metastatic lesion. (A) Non-contrast sagittal view computed tomography image demonstrating tenting and traction of the visceral pleura resulting in forward displacement of the target lesion by the cryoablation probe during positioning (blue arrow). (B) Following 15 s of microwave energy delivery using the Boston Scientific i-Thaw© application, controlled disruption of the tented visceral pleura is observed, allowing optimal juxtaposition to the target lesion and subsequent formation of an ice ball (red arrow). Green arrow and cursor: Digital trajectory alignment marker.
Figure 2: 72-year-old female with metastatic pancreatic cancer presenting with a solitary lung metastatic lesion. (A) Non-contrast sagittal view computed tomography image demonstrating tenting and traction of the visceral pleura resulting in forward displacement of the target lesion by the cryoablation probe during positioning (blue arrow). (B) Following 15 s of microwave energy delivery using the Boston Scientific i-Thaw© application, controlled disruption of the tented visceral pleura is observed, allowing optimal juxtaposition to the target lesion and subsequent formation of an ice ball (red arrow). Green arrow and cursor: Digital trajectory alignment marker.

RESULTS

All four patients were adult patients who presented with oligometastatic lung disease and were referred to Interventional Radiology for thermal ablation therapy. In all cases, brief thermal activation enabled controlled traversal of the tented visceral pleura and accurate probe positioning. No pneumothorax or immediate pleural complications were observed on intra and post-procedural CT imaging or subsequent chest radiographs. All patients were discharged after one overnight observation. Follow-up chest CT images at 1, 3, and 6 months demonstrated expected ablation zones changes without evidence of pleuro-bronchial fistula, delayed pneumothorax, or other procedure-related adverse events.

DISCUSSION

Visceral pleural tenting remains a technically challenging and under-described obstacle in percutaneous lung ablation, particularly for subpleural or fissural lesions.[8] Excessive mechanical force risks uncontrolled pleural rupture or pneumothorax, while alternative techniques such as hydrodissection may not always be feasible or effective.[9,10]

This technical innovation introduces a controlled, energy-assisted method to facilitate pleural traversal using equipment already available during standard ablation procedures. To the best of our knowledge, intentional, transient thermal activation of an ablation probe to facilitate traversal of a tented visceral pleura during percutaneous lung ablation has not been previously described. Prior approaches to pleural tenting focus on mechanical or positional strategies rather than targeted energy-assisted pleural modification. This report introduces a novel technical innovation that leverages existing ablation platforms to enable controlled pleural dissection and improved access when facing unexpected difficulties in passing the visceral pleura.

The successful use of this maneuver across two different thermal platforms suggests potential applicability beyond a single device type. This report is limited by its anecdotal nature and small sample size, and the absence of complications in these cases should not be interpreted as definitive evidence of safety. Further investigation is needed to better define optimal energy parameters and activation duration, to identify lesion and patient characteristics most suitable for this approach, and to evaluate complication rates in larger patient cohorts. Until such data are available, this technique should be applied cautiously by experienced operators and reserved for situations in which conventional strategies to overcome visceral pleural tenting have been unsuccessful.

CONCLUSION

Brief controlled thermal activation of ablation probes may provide a feasible method to overcome visceral pleural tenting during percutaneous lung ablation. This technique enabled accurate probe placement without observed complications in four different patients. While promising, this approach remains preliminary and warrants further investigation before widespread adoption.

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent not required as patients identity is not disclosed or compromised.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology. A chatbot was used for grammar correction and language editing exclusively. No data or photographs were generated using AI tools.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Radiofrequency ablation of stage IA non-small cell lung cancer in medically inoperable patients: Results from the American college of surgeons oncology group Z4033 (alliance) trial. Cancer. 2015;121:3491-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . The frequency and severity of complications in image-guided lung ablation: A systematic review. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:4511-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors close to the heart or aorta: evaluation of safety and effectiveness. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;18:733-40.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of lung cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:604.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , . Pneumothorax as a complication of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for lung tumors: Frequency and risk factors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:S337-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . CT of the pleura: Anatomy and disease. Radiographics. 1994;14:475-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Pleural puncture that excludes the ablation zone decreases the risk of pneumothorax after percutaneous microwave ablation in porcine lung. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26:1052-1058.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Local ablation of pulmonary malignancies abutting pleura: Evaluation of midterm local efficacy and safety. Front Oncol. 2022;12:976777.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and chest tube placement after radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors: Incidence and risk factors. Radiology. 2006;241:275-83.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Microwave ablation therapy assisted by artificial pneumothorax and artificial hydrothorax for lung cancer adjacent to the vital organs. Front Oncol. 2022;12:981789.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections